sl4shd0t
06-04-2008, 10:34 PM
eldavojohn writes "There's an interesting post over at the Kernel Trap that focuses on a man's attempt to find out how many one-time contributors Linux averages per release. Although imperfect due to some obvious unavoidable flaws, he got a few dirty numbers of 'never seen from agains' in the commits from patches 2.6.11 through 2.6.25 and the numbers are: {63, 148, 128, 92, 96, 122, 137, 140, 135, 95, 136, 153, 179, 179, 304}. This makes sense as another reader, Greg KH, pointed out that the distribution curve is tilted towards one-hit contributions, 'the distribution of all of our users are: 50% only contributed 1 patch; 25% contributed 2; 12% contributed 3; 6% contributed 4 and so on ...'"http://developers.slashdot.org/slashdot-it.pl?from=rss&op=image&style=h0&sid=08/06/04/1953217 (http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/04/1953217&from=rss)
Read more of this story (http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/04/1953217&from=rss) at Slashdot.
http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?i=osVUtl</img> (http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?a=osVUtl)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/304798737
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~3/304798737/article.pl)
Read more of this story (http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/04/1953217&from=rss) at Slashdot.
http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?i=osVUtl</img> (http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?a=osVUtl)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/304798737
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~3/304798737/article.pl)