sl4shd0t
06-09-2012, 01:58 PM
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/0/di</img> (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/0/da)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/1/di</img> (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/1/da)
theodp writes "Microsoft recently extended 'It Just Works' compatibility for Visual Basic 6 applications through the full lifetime of Windows 8, so VB6 apps will have at least 24 years of supported lifetime (VB6 shipped in '98). So why has VB6, 'the un-killable ****roach' in the Windows ecosystem, managed to thrive? '****roaches are successful because they're simple,' explains David S. Platt. 'They do what they need to do for their ecological niche and no more. Visual Basic 6 did what its creators intended for its market niche: enable very rapid development of limited programs by programmers of lesser experience.' But when Microsoft proudly trotted out VB.NET, the 'full-fledged language' designed to turn VB6 'bus drivers' into 'fighter pilots,' they got a surprise. 'Almost all Visual Basic 6 programmers were content with what Visual Basic 6 did,' explains Platt. 'They were happy to be bus drivers: to leave the office at 5 p.m. (or 4:30 p.m. on a really nice day) instead of working until midnight; to play with their families on weekends instead of trudging back to the office; to sleep with their spouses instead of pulling another coding all-nighter and eating cold pizza for breakfast. They didn't lament the lack of operator overloading or polymorphism in Visual Basic 6, so they didn't say much.'" http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Why+Visual+Basic+6+Still+Thrives%3A+ht tp%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FMV9rNx) http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org% 2Fstory%2F12%2F06%2F09%2F0240204%2Fwhy-visual-basic-6-still-thrives%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfac ebook) http://www.gstatic.com/images/icons/gplus-16.png (http://plus.google.com/share?url=http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/09/0240204/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=googleplus)
Read more of this story (http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/09/0240204/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/QCrHSkzRHWs
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~3/QCrHSkzRHWs/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives)
http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/1/di</img> (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uTwYMKO5Us0l4fVa5IKrMNDfsWY/1/da)
theodp writes "Microsoft recently extended 'It Just Works' compatibility for Visual Basic 6 applications through the full lifetime of Windows 8, so VB6 apps will have at least 24 years of supported lifetime (VB6 shipped in '98). So why has VB6, 'the un-killable ****roach' in the Windows ecosystem, managed to thrive? '****roaches are successful because they're simple,' explains David S. Platt. 'They do what they need to do for their ecological niche and no more. Visual Basic 6 did what its creators intended for its market niche: enable very rapid development of limited programs by programmers of lesser experience.' But when Microsoft proudly trotted out VB.NET, the 'full-fledged language' designed to turn VB6 'bus drivers' into 'fighter pilots,' they got a surprise. 'Almost all Visual Basic 6 programmers were content with what Visual Basic 6 did,' explains Platt. 'They were happy to be bus drivers: to leave the office at 5 p.m. (or 4:30 p.m. on a really nice day) instead of working until midnight; to play with their families on weekends instead of trudging back to the office; to sleep with their spouses instead of pulling another coding all-nighter and eating cold pizza for breakfast. They didn't lament the lack of operator overloading or polymorphism in Visual Basic 6, so they didn't say much.'" http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Why+Visual+Basic+6+Still+Thrives%3A+ht tp%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FMV9rNx) http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org% 2Fstory%2F12%2F06%2F09%2F0240204%2Fwhy-visual-basic-6-still-thrives%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfac ebook) http://www.gstatic.com/images/icons/gplus-16.png (http://plus.google.com/share?url=http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/09/0240204/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives?utm_source=slashdot&utm_medium=googleplus)
Read more of this story (http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/06/09/0240204/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/QCrHSkzRHWs
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~3/QCrHSkzRHWs/why-visual-basic-6-still-thrives)