The Great Microkernel Debate Continues

[sl4shd0t]

ficken writes "The great micro vs. monolithic kernel is still alive and well. Andy Tanenbaum weighs in with another article about the virtues of microkernels. From the article: 'Over the years there have been endless postings on forums such as Slashdot about how microkernels are slow, how microkernels are hard to program, how they aren't in use commercially, and a lot of other nonsense. Virtually all of these postings have come from people who don't have a clue what a microkernel is or what one can do. I think it would raise the level of discussion if people making such postings would first try a microkernel-based operating system and then make postings like "I tried an OS based on a microkernel and I observed X, Y, and Z first hand." Has a lot more credibility.'"Read more of this story (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/31/1617254&from=rss) at Slashdot.
http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?i=LRwL2I</img> (http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers?a=LRwL2I)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/226638750

More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~3/226638750/article.pl)