View Single Post
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:59 PM
sl4shd0t
Posts: n/a
  #1  
Default Flash Builder 4 mdash; Defective By Design?

ApolloX writes "Adobe has released its new version of the Flex Builder, now renamed Flash Builder 4. This version is radically different from previous versions of Flex, introducing the new Spark architecture and theme support. While I am pleased Adobe has finally added support for Eclipse 3.5, I am disappointed with some of the new architecture changes that make doing simple things, such as skinning a button, now quite cumbersome."pa href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org% 2Fstory%2F10%2F04%2F02%2F2240217%2FFlash-Builder-4-mdash-Defective-By-Design" target="_blank" title="Share on Facebook"img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"/a a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Flash+Builder+4+%26mdash%3B+Defective+ By+Design%3F%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FdwyHqJ" target="_blank" title="Share on Twitter"img src="http://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"/a/ppa href="http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/04/02/2240217/Flash-Builder-4-mdash-Defective-By-Design?from=rss"Read more of this story/a at Slashdot./p pa href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bw9J6TGoOZcZRLvi4CqWc_pSS5M/0/da"img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bw9J6TGoOZcZRLvi4CqWc_pSS5M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"/img/abr/ a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bw9J6TGoOZcZRLvi4CqWc_pSS5M/1/da"img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/bw9J6TGoOZcZRLvi4CqWc_pSS5M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"/img/a/pimg src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdotDevelopers/~4/7lUt2Kv9c-U" height="1" width="1"/

More...
Reply With Quote